🗳️ Understanding Michigan Proposal 1: The Constitutional Convention Question

On November 3, 2026, Michigan voters will decide whether to call a constitutional convention to consider a general revision of the state Constitution. Proposal 2026-1 appears automatically under a constitutional requirement that voters consider this question every 16 years.

This overview provides factual, nonpartisan information and does not endorse or oppose the proposal.

_{What Would Proposal 1 Do?}

If approved, voters would elect 148 delegates—one from each Michigan House and Senate district—to a constitutional convention. Delegates would meet in Lansing in 2027 to review the Constitution and develop proposed changes.

The convention could consider the entire document, including provisions governing elections, taxation, education, individual rights and the structure of state government. Proposal 1 does not specify which changes delegates should make.

_{What Would a Yes or No Vote Mean?}

A “yes” vote would authorize a constitutional convention. It would not itself change the Constitution. Any proposed constitution or amendments produced by the convention would require approval in a subsequent statewide vote.

A “no” vote would reject calling a convention through this proposal. The automatic question would return in 2042. Existing processes for proposing individual constitutional amendments would remain available.

_{Arguments Presented by Supporters and Opponents}

Those favoring a convention describe it as an opportunity to modernize state government, address structural problems and reconsider provisions adopted decades ago.

Opponents raise concerns about the convention’s cost, uncertainty over its outcome and the possibility that delegates could propose removing existing constitutional protections, including provisions recently approved by voters.

These arguments reflect different views about the benefits and risks of a broad constitutional review. Voters would retain the final decision on any changes proposed by the convention.

_{Why Associations Should Pay Attention}

Michigan’s Constitution establishes the framework within which associations and their members operate. A convention could consider issues affecting public policy, government authority, taxation and education.

Association leaders can help members make informed decisions by sharing reliable resources and distinguishing the question of calling a convention from any specific changes that might later be proposed.

_{Resources to Learn More}

• Michigan Department of State: Ballot summary materials for Proposals 1 and 2

• Citizens Research Council of Michigan: Nonpartisan summary of Proposal 1

• Citizens Research Council of Michigan: Detailed analyses of Michigan constitutional issues

• Bridge Michigan: How a constitutional convention would work, including arguments for and against it

• Michigan Voter Information Center: View your ballot and voting information